Paolo G. Parovel and me lodged an analysis of the 19 March ordinance: not even the “Treaty” of Osimo returned Trieste to Italy.
ADMINISTRATION OR SOVREIGNITY?
March 19th, 2014: for the first time, an Italian judge recognized that Trieste did not return to Italy in 1954. The next hearing is on April 9th.
![[Gallery] 9 April 2014: sit-in at the Court](https://www.movimentotriestelibera.net/wp/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/9_4_2014_0.jpeg "[Gallery] 9 April 2014: sit-in at the Court")
[Gallery] 9 April 2014: sit-in at the Court
2014. The judge in charge of the proceeding is Mr. Leanza: he has confirmed that the 1954 Memorandum of Understanding of London did not return Trieste to Italy.
THREATENED WITH REPRESSION: WE HURT YOU
21 March 2014: Italian “patriots” call Giurastante “Giudastante” and claim he shall be “taken out of the way” – hopefully – with the support of the judiciary.
TURNING POINT
For the first time since the re-opening of Question Trieste, a judge declared that the 1954 Memorandum of Understanding did not return Trieste to Italy.
The Memorandum of Understanding of London did not “return” Trieste to Italy
Judge Leanza confirmed it with a new ordinance: the 1954 MoU is a special trusteeship mandate, it does not affect sovereignty.